|
|
|||||
|
9 January 2009- 04:23 PM
The Convergence of Information Security, Privacy and Complianceby Christine Generali, Group PublisherThe April 2009 Cutter IT Journal -- with Guest Editor Cutter Senior Consultant Rebecca Herold, recently named one of the "Best Privacy Advisers" and "Best Privacy Consultancies" of 2008 by Computerworld -- invites insightful debate on and analyses of approaches organizations are taking to ensure that information security, privacy and compliance areas collaborate, and how to address the associated convergence issues. What are the information security, privacy and compliance issues that impact organizations most significantly? What are the best practices for addressing the associated compliance requirements? What are the best ways to manage convergence? How can gaps be avoided? How can conflicts be resolved?Cutter IT Journal Call for Papers
The Convergence of Information Security, Privacy and ComplianceThe need for convergence is nothing new. There has been much talk recently regarding a convergence of information security and privacy. However, this convergence has actually existed ever since privacy became a concern. After all, privacy requires the implementation of information security controls and appropriate safeguards. I experienced this relationship firsthand during the early 1990's before the passage of GLBA or HIPAA. At that time, although bills addressing privacy had been considered in the US and around the world, OECD Privacy principles were the basis for most of the privacy requirements. While establishing the security requirements for one of the very first online banks, I recognized the need for a privacy policy based not simply upon legislation, but also on the need to obtain and maintain customer trust. This policy, based predominately upon the OECD Privacy principles, brought the need for security controls clearly into focus. Over time, I've identified over twenty business areas where information security and privacy responsibilities and activities converge; this number continues to grow as technology, laws and businesses evolve. Understanding and complying with the multiple requirements of the at least 46 U.S. privacy breach notice laws is a recent example of how privacy and information security need to work together for effective enterprise-wide management. And there are growing numbers of new U.S. state-level laws, U.S. federal laws, and international laws. Additionally, the growing numbers of incidents, accompanied by growing numbers of fines, penalties and civil actions, emphasize the need for convergence. At the core of compliance for these hundreds of laws and regulations is:
TO SUBMIT AN ARTICLE IDEAPlease respond to Rebecca Herold at rebeccaherold[at]rebeccaherold[dot]com with a copy to itjournal[at]cutter[dot]com, no later than 23 January and include an extended abstract and a short article outline showing major discussion points.ARTICLE DEADLINEArticles are due on 6 March 2009.EDITORIAL GUIDELINESMost Cutter IT Journal articles are approximately 2,500-3,500 words long, plus whatever graphics are appropriate. If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to contact CITJ's Group Publisher, Christine Generali at cgenerali[at]cutter[dot]com or the Guest Editor, Rebecca Herold at rebeccaherold[at]rebeccaherold[dot]com. Editorial guidelines are available online.AUDIENCETypical readers of Cutter IT Journal range from CIOs and vice presidents of software organizations to IT managers, directors, project leaders, and very senior technical staff. Most work in fairly large organizations: Fortune 500 IT shops, large computer vendors (IBM, HP, etc.), and government agencies. 48% of our readership is outside of the US (15% from Canada, 14% Europe, 5% Australia/NZ, 14% elsewhere). Please avoid introductory-level, tutorial coverage of a topic. Assume you're writing for someone who has been in the industry for 10 to 20 years, is very busy, and very impatient. Assume he or she will be asking, "What's the point? What do I do with this information?" Apply the "So what?" test to everything you write.PROMOTIONAL OPPORTUNITIESWe are pleased to offer Journal authors a year's complimentary subscription and 10 copies of the issue in which they are published. In addition, we occasionally pull excerpts, along with the author's bio, to include in our weekly Cutter Edge e-mail bulletin, which reaches another 8,000 readers. We'd also be pleased to quote you, or passages from your article, in Cutter press releases. If you plan to be speaking at industry conferences, we can arrange to make copies of your article or the entire issue available for attendees of those speaking engagements -- furthering your own promotional efforts.ABOUT CUTTER IT JOURNALNo other journal brings together so many cutting-edge thinkers, and lets them speak so bluntly and frankly. We strive to maintain the Journal's reputation as the "Harvard Business Review of IT." Our goal is to present well-grounded opinion (based on real, accountable experiences), research, and animated debate about each topic the Journal explores. FEEL FREE TO FORWARD THIS CALL FOR PAPERS TO ANYONE WHO MIGHT HAVE AN APPROPRIATE SUBMISSION.Comments and TrackbacksPost a Comment (or leave a trackback) |
SearchRecently Published
Recent Comments
Categories
Cutter Bloggers
ArchivesSubscribe |
Cuttertweets
Special OfferSubscribe to Cutter IT Journal through this offer and:
|
|||
| Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. | |||||
|
The Blog |
About Cutter |
Meet the Experts |
Cutter Consortium |
Contact Us |
Follow Us on Twitter |
Find us on Facebook |
|
|||||
Hi, Great blog!
Extending the scope of your post a little – as a nurse (and occasional patient!) confidentiality (which increasingly relies on the security of ICT systems) is of course vital to my profession and professionalism in theory and practice.
I’ve been wondering though whether the way that Jo-public views their clinical record is undergoing a change that will increasingly make it a currency for exchange within a *wider* community given the rise of electronic and personal health records, Health 2.0, 3.0…. That is a community not just restricted to health and social care professionals, but services and other agencies keen to ‘add value’.
Health has always been commodified, but perhaps this for the ‘professions’ is the ultimate trip?
Any thoughts – or directions to references…?
Many thanks
Peter Jones
http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/
Hodges’ Health Career – Care Domains – Model
http://hodges-model.blogspot.com/
h2cm: help 2C more – help 2 listen – help 2 care
peter jones On January 10th, 2009 at 8:33 am